A conservative, measurable plan to build the Jerusalem farm into a dependable income engine for Family Voice Ministries while allowing the farm to help finance its own productive expansion.
Build Jerusalem to generate at least $1,000.00 per month in net income for Family Voice Ministries. At current needs, that amount can support 10 orphans in private school and cover church expenses, including Pastor Musa's salary, allowing outside monthly support to be retained by Brothers for Christ for reserves or future growth projects.
Aggregate data only. Planning assumptions are intentionally conservative and will be replaced by actual farm performance.
The land and livestock operation are divided into two separately owned farm sides.
Jerusalem is the church and ministry farm. Its future net income is intended to support Family Voice Ministries, including education for the children and ongoing church expenses.
Jerusalem currently has one doe-and-kid house. Every housing number below applies only to Jerusalem.
Judea is Pastor Musa's farm side. Its herd, housing capacity and future profits are separate from Jerusalem's ministry plan.
The teams may share labor and some farm-wide operating purchases for now, but Judea's existing house is not counted as Jerusalem housing.
This view follows the ministry goat farm that Brothers for Christ is developing toward self-sufficiency.
Jerusalem is being built as a productive asset for Family Voice Ministries. Future Jerusalem net income is intended to support the ministry's ongoing work rather than require permanent outside operating support.
The target is at least $1,000.00 per month net from Jerusalem. The plan measures productive does, births, mortality, sales, realized prices, operating costs and housing capacity against that outcome.
New breeding stock and housing are staged according to Jerusalem's productive capacity. Early expansion may require BFC bridge funding; later livestock sales are expected to fund an increasing share of infrastructure.
The August 22, 2026 assumptions are preserved as a dated baseline. Future plans will be appended with actual farm results so supporters can see where projections proved conservative, optimistic or accurate.
The model works backward from the ministry income requirement; housing is planned with additional physical capacity.
| Conservative selling price | $85.00/goat |
| Breeding-stock purchase ceiling | $120.00/goat |
| Steady-state saleable goats | 1.0/doe/year |
| Jerusalem annual operating allowance | $4,704.00 |
| Annual net income goal | $12,000.00 |
| Gross revenue needed | $16,704.00 |
The current mathematical threshold is approximately 197 productive Jerusalem does, so the working income target is 197. Seven Jerusalem doe houses provide planned room for about 210–224 adult does, leaving physical space above the financial threshold. Actual sales and costs must still be measured because the income projection is not guaranteed.
Live progress: 26 / 197
Steady-state model after ordinary replacement females are retained.
The rust line marks the $16,704.00 gross requirement used in the dated plan.
Gross sales less the dated $4,704.00 Jerusalem annual operating-cost allowance.
| Productive Does | Saleable Goats/Yr | Gross/Yr | Planning Net/Yr | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 50 | $4,250.00 | -$454.00 | $12,454.00 short |
| 100 | 100 | $8,500.00 | $3,796.00 | $8,204.00 short |
| 150 | 150 | $12,750.00 | $8,046.00 | $3,954.00 short |
| 175 | 175 | $14,875.00 | $10,171.00 | $1,829.00 short |
| 190 | 190 | $16,150.00 | $11,446.00 | $554.00 short |
| 197 | 197 | $16,745.00 | $12,041.00 | Meets goal +$41.00 |
The key is to protect the females needed for growth and sell the market-ready males. The 53-goat figure is a worked financing example, not a requirement to sell 53 breeding animals.
Conservative growth illustration: one surviving kid per productive doe per year, about 50% male and 50% female. Quality females needed for expansion are retained.
If Jerusalem reaches 106 productive breeding does, the conservative model assumes about 106 surviving kids during one annual production cycle.
| Approx. male kids | 53 |
| Approx. female kids | 53 |
| Sell 53 market-ready males at $85.00 | $4,505.00 |
| Projected next-house budget | $4,500.00 |
| Quality female replacements sold for the house | 0 |
These are planning illustrations using the same conservative assumptions. Actual births, survival, sex ratio, sale timing and prices will vary.
| Productive Does | Surviving Kids | Approx. Males Sold | Approx. Females Retained | Male-Sale Gross | House Funded | Approx. BFC Bridge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 | 50 | 25 | 25 | $2,125.00 | 47% | $2,375.00 |
| 75 | 75 | ~38 | ~37 | $3,230.00 | 72% | $1,270.00 |
| 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | $4,250.00 | 94% | $250.00 |
| 106 | 106 | 53 | 53 | $4,505.00 | 100% | $0 |
The house must be ready before retained young females create overcrowding. Using the current planning capacity of about 38 adult does per house, the next house should be planned when existing houses average roughly 30–32 adult does, or sooner if retained doelings will push the herd beyond comfortable capacity before the next construction window.
That means BFC may sometimes front or bridge the construction cost first. Male-sale proceeds from the coming production cycle can then offset that cost or refill the Jerusalem Growth Reserve.
At an earlier stage, the farm may generate only part of a house cost. For example, at about 50 productive does, selling approximately 25 market-ready males at $85.00 produces about $2,125.00. Instead of BFC automatically paying the full $4,500.00, the farm contributes what it has produced and BFC bridges the remaining approximately $2,375.00.
As the herd grows, the farm's contribution rises until a production cycle can potentially finance an entire house itself.
These are the actual Jerusalem goat-house facilities behind the capacity and construction-cost assumptions used in this plan.
Jerusalem · Amolatar, Uganda
The revised plan uses the adult portion of each building, recognized Extension guidance and a conservative operating limit.
| Total raised structure | 765 sq. ft. |
| Approximate adult section: 33–35 ft × 17 ft | 561–595 sq. ft. |
| Approximate kid/kidding section: 10–12 ft × 17 ft | 170–204 sq. ft. |
The kid/kidding section cannot also be counted as permanent adult-doe capacity. Feeders, water, handling space, pregnant animals and retained young females also reduce usable group space.
Cornell describes 12–15 sq. ft. of shelter per doe when an exercise yard is available. New Mexico State describes 10–15 sq. ft. of bedded adult space plus 25 sq. ft. of exercise space, with separate kidding pens of at least 4 ft × 5 ft.
Jerusalem therefore plans only 30–32 productive adult does per existing-size house. This is deliberately below the raw floor-area maximum and does not replace local veterinary or construction review.
This is a separate management facility and is not one of the seven Jerusalem doe-and-kid houses.
Rural concept · local design review requiredOklahoma State's planning rule of one buck per 25–35 does suggests approximately 6–8 breeding bucks at 197 productive does. Missouri Extension recommends separate buck housing, and Mississippi State advises separating buck kids from does at about 2–4 months to prevent premature breeding.
The working concept provides 10 individual adult-buck stalls, separate male nursery and growout pens, and separated outdoor runs. Individual stalls reduce direct adult-buck contact and make controlled breeding easier; they do not remove the need for strong gates, daily inspection and competent animal management.
The concept is based on the farm's affordable raised timber construction: wooden poles, elevated slatted wood floors, corrugated roofing and woven-wire runs.
The nursery and growout capacity must be checked against Jerusalem's actual kidding batches and male sale age. A local builder, livestock officer or veterinarian should approve the final dimensions, drainage, ventilation, feed access and handling route before construction.
Concept images only: these are planning mockups, not architectural or engineering drawings.
Housing follows Jerusalem herd growth rather than being built all at once. The separate male facility is budgeted only after a local quotation.
| Existing house footprint | 45 ft × 17 ft = 765 sq. ft. |
| Adult portion of each house | ~561–595 sq. ft. |
| Kid/kidding portion | ~170–204 sq. ft. |
| Jerusalem operating capacity | 30–32 adult does/house |
| Jerusalem doe houses | 7 total · 1 current · 6 additional |
| Six houses at historic $3,600 benchmark | $21,600.00 |
| Six houses at $4,500 planning reserve | $27,000.00 |
| Separate male facility | Local quote pending; excluded above |
A typical accelerated phase combines productive animals and the capacity to house them:
| 25 breeding females at $120.00 | $3,000.00 |
| One future goat house | $4,500.00 |
| Total illustrative phase | $7,500.00 |
| Equivalent goat sales at $85.00 | 89 goats |
How this phase can be financed: retain the best female offspring for herd growth, sell market-ready males, and apply Jerusalem's available net sale proceeds toward the next housing phase. If the house must be started before those sales are realized, BFC can bridge the timing gap. As Jerusalem grows, the farm should finance an increasing share of each new house until BFC bridge funding is no longer routinely needed.
| Jerusalem Breeding Does | House Equivalents | Additional Houses | Future Budget |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30–32 | 1 | Current Jerusalem house | Already built |
| 60–64 | 2 | +1 total | $4,500.00 |
| 90–96 | 3 | +2 total | $9,000.00 |
| 120–128 | 4 | +3 total | $13,500.00 |
| 150–160 | 5 | +4 total | $18,000.00 |
| 180–192 | 6 | +5 total | $22,500.00 |
| 210–224 | 7 | +6 total | $27,000.00 |
This plan is designed to improve accountability, not promise a guaranteed outcome.
Our goal is not permanent dependence on outside gifts. Jerusalem will retain the best females needed for herd growth, sell market-ready males and surplus animals, and reinvest farm-generated proceeds into future housing and productive capacity. Early in the climb, however, the herd is not yet large enough to finance every expansion step on its own. A cash gift toward goat housing or other productive infrastructure can shorten that gap without forcing the farm to sell the females needed to reach self-sufficiency.
The intent is for farm-generated income to fund an increasing share of each future expansion phase, reducing the amount that must be raised externally.
Satellite view of the farm property and the outlined planning areas in Amolatar, Uganda.
Property planning image